Cucumber Report
Jenkins
Previous results
Latest results
Features
Tags
Steps
Trends
Failures
Project
Number
Date
test_Tails_ISO_devel
3250
24 Jan 2024, 19:25
Feature Report
Steps
Scenarios
Features
Feature
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Pending
Undefined
Total
Passed
Failed
Total
Duration
Status
The Tor enforcement is effective
42
0
0
0
0
42
9
0
9
2:47.264
Passed
Tags:
@product
Feature
The Tor enforcement is effective
As a Tails user I want all direct Internet connections I do by mistake or applications do by misconfiguration or buggy leaks to be blocked And as a Tails developer I want to ensure that the automated test suite detects firewall leaks reliably
Tags:
@product
12.536
Scenario
The firewall configuration is very restrictive
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.963
Then
the firewall's policy is to drop all IPv4 traffic
0.131
And
the firewall is configured to only allow the clearnet and debian-tor users to connect directly to the Internet over IPv4
0.292
And
the firewall's NAT rules only redirect traffic for the Unsafe Browser, Tor's TransPort, and DNSPort
0.064
And
the firewall is configured to block all external IPv6 traffic
0.084
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.668
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
49.481
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks from the Unsafe Browser with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.601
And
I capture all network traffic
0.009
When
I successfully start the Unsafe Browser
26.888
And
I open the Tails homepage in the Unsafe Browser
9.873
And
the Tails homepage loads in the Unsafe Browser
0.645
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.462
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.750
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.031
Tags:
@product
12.114
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.286
And
I capture all network traffic
0.008
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.254
When
I do a TCP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.465
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.099
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.630
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.048
Tags:
@product
12.945
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting UDP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.079
And
I capture all network traffic
0.008
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.313
When
I do a UDP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.462
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.081
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.618
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.045
Tags:
@product
16.163
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting ICMP leaks of ping with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.008
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.512
And
I capture all network traffic
0.008
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.280
When
I send some ICMP pings
4.249
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.112
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.689
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.050
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
13.559
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified TCP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.008
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.250
When
I open an untorified TCP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.226
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.082
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.295
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.621
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
11.620
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified UDP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.011
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.271
When
I open an untorified UDP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
0.278
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.070
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.308
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.656
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
17.211
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified ICMP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.772
When
I open an untorified ICMP connection to 1.2.3.4
5.351
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.087
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.401
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.638
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
21.632
Scenario
The system DNS is always set up to use Tor's DNSPort
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD without network and logged in
8.128
And
the system DNS is using the local DNS resolver
0.014
And
the network is plugged
0.051
And
I successfully configure Tor
13.425
Then
the system DNS is still using the local DNS resolver
0.011
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.685
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
generate Cucumber HTML reports via:
Jenkins Plugin
|
Standalone
|
Sandwich
|
Maven