Cucumber Report
Jenkins
Previous results
Latest results
Features
Tags
Steps
Trends
Failures
Project
Number
Date
test_Tails_ISO_devel
3289
20 Feb 2024, 12:36
Feature Report
Steps
Scenarios
Features
Feature
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Pending
Undefined
Total
Passed
Failed
Total
Duration
Status
The Tor enforcement is effective
42
0
0
0
0
42
9
0
9
2:51.944
Passed
Tags:
@product
Feature
The Tor enforcement is effective
As a Tails user I want all direct Internet connections I do by mistake or applications do by misconfiguration or buggy leaks to be blocked And as a Tails developer I want to ensure that the automated test suite detects firewall leaks reliably
Tags:
@product
12.157
Scenario
The firewall configuration is very restrictive
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.612
Then
the firewall's policy is to drop all IPv4 traffic
0.137
And
the firewall is configured to only allow the clearnet and debian-tor users to connect directly to the Internet over IPv4
0.232
And
the firewall's NAT rules only redirect traffic for the Unsafe Browser, Tor's TransPort, and DNSPort
0.089
And
the firewall is configured to block all external IPv6 traffic
0.085
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.630
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
40.049
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks from the Unsafe Browser with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.451
And
I capture all network traffic
0.008
When
I successfully start the Unsafe Browser
15.494
And
I open the Tails homepage in the Unsafe Browser
12.075
And
the Tails homepage loads in the Unsafe Browser
0.610
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.409
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
1.110
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.056
Tags:
@product
12.433
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.450
And
I capture all network traffic
0.009
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.224
When
I do a TCP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.657
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.090
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.641
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.046
Tags:
@product
13.459
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting UDP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.462
And
I capture all network traffic
0.007
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.232
When
I do a UDP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.668
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.088
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.728
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.044
Tags:
@product
17.311
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting ICMP leaks of ping with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.864
And
I capture all network traffic
0.004
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.235
When
I send some ICMP pings
4.108
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.098
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.583
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.039
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
12.935
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified TCP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.591
When
I open an untorified TCP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.273
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.070
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.237
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.595
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
11.526
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified UDP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.174
When
I open an untorified UDP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
0.276
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.074
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.214
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.610
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
16.860
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified ICMP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.477
When
I open an untorified ICMP connection to 1.2.3.4
5.308
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.074
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.326
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.671
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
35.211
Scenario
The system DNS is always set up to use Tor's DNSPort
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD without network and logged in
21.625
And
the system DNS is using the local DNS resolver
0.014
And
the network is plugged
0.075
And
I successfully configure Tor
13.480
Then
the system DNS is still using the local DNS resolver
0.014
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
1.030
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
generate Cucumber HTML reports via:
Jenkins Plugin
|
Standalone
|
Sandwich
|
Maven