Cucumber Report
Jenkins
Previous results
Latest results
Features
Tags
Steps
Trends
Failures
Project
Number
Date
test_Tails_ISO_devel
3598
24 Nov 2024, 12:53
Feature Report
Steps
Scenarios
Features
Feature
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Pending
Undefined
Total
Passed
Failed
Total
Duration
Status
The Tor enforcement is effective
43
0
0
0
0
43
9
0
9
2:57.303
Passed
Tags:
@product
Feature
The Tor enforcement is effective
As a Tails user I want all direct Internet connections I do by mistake or applications do by misconfiguration or buggy leaks to be blocked And as a Tails developer I want to ensure that the automated test suite detects firewall leaks reliably
Tags:
@product
14.133
Scenario
The firewall configuration is very restrictive
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:269
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.559
Then
the firewall's policy is to drop all IPv4 traffic
0.169
And
the firewall is configured to only allow the clearnet and debian-tor users to connect directly to the Internet over IPv4
0.224
And
the firewall's NAT rules only redirect traffic for the Unsafe Browser, Tor's TransPort, and DNSPort
0.099
And
the firewall is configured to block all external IPv6 traffic
0.081
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:326
0.687
After
features/support/hooks.rb:100
0.000
Tags:
@product
45.082
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks from the Unsafe Browser with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:269
0.008
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.025
And
I capture all network traffic
0.011
When
I successfully start the Unsafe Browser
19.193
And
I open the Tails homepage in the Unsafe Browser
11.721
And
the Tails homepage loads in the Unsafe Browser
0.622
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.508
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:326
1.217
After
features/support/hooks.rb:100
0.056
Tags:
@product
14.523
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:269
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.254
And
I capture all network traffic
0.005
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.229
When
I do a TCP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.943
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.091
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:326
0.763
After
features/support/hooks.rb:100
0.049
Tags:
@product
15.112
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting UDP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:269
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
14.062
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.226
When
I do a UDP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.727
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.089
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:326
0.593
After
features/support/hooks.rb:100
0.045
Tags:
@product
17.222
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting ICMP leaks of ping with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:269
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.684
And
I capture all network traffic
0.007
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.250
When
I send some ICMP pings
4.189
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.091
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:326
0.645
After
features/support/hooks.rb:100
0.075
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
14.094
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified TCP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:269
0.005
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:507
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.672
When
I open an untorified TCP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.351
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.070
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:515
0.280
After
features/support/hooks.rb:326
0.614
After
features/support/hooks.rb:100
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
13.847
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified UDP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:269
0.007
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:507
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.432
When
I open an untorified UDP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.342
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.071
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:515
0.260
After
features/support/hooks.rb:326
0.606
After
features/support/hooks.rb:100
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
18.511
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified ICMP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:269
0.007
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:507
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.042
When
I open an untorified ICMP connection to 1.2.3.4
5.404
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.064
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:515
0.229
After
features/support/hooks.rb:326
0.611
After
features/support/hooks.rb:100
0.000
Tags:
@product
24.775
Scenario
The system DNS is always set up to use Tor's DNSPort
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:269
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD without network and logged in
8.247
And
the system DNS is using the local DNS resolver
0.022
And
the network is plugged
0.077
And
I successfully configure Tor
16.411
Then
the system DNS is still using the local DNS resolver
0.016
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:326
0.802
After
features/support/hooks.rb:100
0.000
generate Cucumber HTML reports via:
Jenkins Plugin
|
Standalone
|
Sandwich
|
Maven