Cucumber Report
Jenkins
Previous results
Latest results
Features
Tags
Steps
Trends
Failures
Project
Number
Date
test_Tails_ISO_stable
4542
30 Nov 2023, 16:16
Feature Report
Steps
Scenarios
Features
Feature
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Pending
Undefined
Total
Passed
Failed
Total
Duration
Status
The Tor enforcement is effective
42
0
0
0
0
42
9
0
9
3:9.468
Passed
Tags:
@product
Feature
The Tor enforcement is effective
As a Tails user I want all direct Internet connections I do by mistake or applications do by misconfiguration or buggy leaks to be blocked And as a Tails developer I want to ensure that the automated test suite detects firewall leaks reliably
Tags:
@product
13.818
Scenario
The firewall configuration is very restrictive
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.189
Then
the firewall's policy is to drop all IPv4 traffic
0.126
And
the firewall is configured to only allow the clearnet and debian-tor users to connect directly to the Internet over IPv4
0.310
And
the firewall's NAT rules only redirect traffic for the Unsafe Browser, Tor's TransPort, and DNSPort
0.098
And
the firewall is configured to block all external IPv6 traffic
0.093
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.708
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
57.380
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks from the Unsafe Browser with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.343
And
I capture all network traffic
0.009
When
I successfully start the Unsafe Browser
32.934
And
I open the Tails homepage in the Unsafe Browser
11.012
And
the Tails homepage loads in the Unsafe Browser
0.651
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.428
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
1.670
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.040
Tags:
@product
14.420
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.278
And
I capture all network traffic
0.010
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.344
When
I do a TCP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.647
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.140
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.691
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.043
Tags:
@product
14.100
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting UDP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.008
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.710
And
I capture all network traffic
0.010
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.331
When
I do a UDP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.919
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.129
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.757
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.044
Tags:
@product
17.982
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting ICMP leaks of ping with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.012
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.328
And
I capture all network traffic
0.009
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.290
When
I send some ICMP pings
4.209
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.143
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.920
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.043
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
15.060
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified TCP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.009
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.009
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.613
When
I open an untorified TCP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.348
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.098
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.557
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.719
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
13.702
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified UDP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.017
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.027
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.247
When
I open an untorified UDP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
0.341
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.113
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.488
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.966
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
18.504
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified ICMP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.008
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.008
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.021
When
I open an untorified ICMP connection to 1.2.3.4
5.397
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.085
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.613
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.751
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
24.499
Scenario
The system DNS is always set up to use Tor's DNSPort
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.009
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD without network and logged in
9.401
And
the system DNS is using the local DNS resolver
0.023
And
the network is plugged
0.036
And
I successfully configure Tor
15.021
Then
the system DNS is still using the local DNS resolver
0.017
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.821
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
generate Cucumber HTML reports via:
Jenkins Plugin
|
Standalone
|
Sandwich
|
Maven