Cucumber Report
Jenkins
Previous results
Latest results
Features
Tags
Steps
Trends
Failures
Project
Number
Date
test_Tails_ISO_stable
4549
04 Dec 2023, 19:42
Feature Report
Steps
Scenarios
Features
Feature
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Pending
Undefined
Total
Passed
Failed
Total
Duration
Status
The Tor enforcement is effective
42
0
0
0
0
42
9
0
9
2:49.364
Passed
Tags:
@product
Feature
The Tor enforcement is effective
As a Tails user I want all direct Internet connections I do by mistake or applications do by misconfiguration or buggy leaks to be blocked And as a Tails developer I want to ensure that the automated test suite detects firewall leaks reliably
Tags:
@product
12.097
Scenario
The firewall configuration is very restrictive
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.598
Then
the firewall's policy is to drop all IPv4 traffic
0.092
And
the firewall is configured to only allow the clearnet and debian-tor users to connect directly to the Internet over IPv4
0.251
And
the firewall's NAT rules only redirect traffic for the Unsafe Browser, Tor's TransPort, and DNSPort
0.076
And
the firewall is configured to block all external IPv6 traffic
0.078
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.843
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
50.504
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks from the Unsafe Browser with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.758
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
When
I successfully start the Unsafe Browser
27.750
And
I open the Tails homepage in the Unsafe Browser
9.983
And
the Tails homepage loads in the Unsafe Browser
0.616
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.389
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.727
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.048
Tags:
@product
13.062
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.004
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.066
And
I capture all network traffic
0.005
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.222
When
I do a TCP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.684
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.084
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.662
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.037
Tags:
@product
12.741
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting UDP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.004
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.818
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.201
When
I do a UDP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.627
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.087
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.606
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.063
Tags:
@product
16.078
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting ICMP leaks of ping with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.539
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.235
When
I send some ICMP pings
4.187
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.110
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.669
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.054
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
12.966
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified TCP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.679
When
I open an untorified TCP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.201
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.085
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.267
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.592
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
12.323
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified UDP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.990
When
I open an untorified UDP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
0.267
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.065
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.295
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.855
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
17.022
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified ICMP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.004
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.003
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.609
When
I open an untorified ICMP connection to 1.2.3.4
5.342
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.071
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.272
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.612
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
22.566
Scenario
The system DNS is always set up to use Tor's DNSPort
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD without network and logged in
8.040
And
the system DNS is using the local DNS resolver
0.012
And
the network is plugged
0.060
And
I successfully configure Tor
14.438
Then
the system DNS is still using the local DNS resolver
0.013
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.626
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
generate Cucumber HTML reports via:
Jenkins Plugin
|
Standalone
|
Sandwich
|
Maven