Cucumber Report
Jenkins
Previous results
Latest results
Features
Tags
Steps
Trends
Failures
Project
Number
Date
test_Tails_ISO_stable
4581
21 Dec 2023, 12:09
Feature Report
Steps
Scenarios
Features
Feature
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Pending
Undefined
Total
Passed
Failed
Total
Duration
Status
The Tor enforcement is effective
42
0
0
0
0
42
9
0
9
2:55.491
Passed
Tags:
@product
Feature
The Tor enforcement is effective
As a Tails user I want all direct Internet connections I do by mistake or applications do by misconfiguration or buggy leaks to be blocked And as a Tails developer I want to ensure that the automated test suite detects firewall leaks reliably
Tags:
@product
14.361
Scenario
The firewall configuration is very restrictive
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.008
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
13.636
Then
the firewall's policy is to drop all IPv4 traffic
0.129
And
the firewall is configured to only allow the clearnet and debian-tor users to connect directly to the Internet over IPv4
0.412
And
the firewall's NAT rules only redirect traffic for the Unsafe Browser, Tor's TransPort, and DNSPort
0.097
And
the firewall is configured to block all external IPv6 traffic
0.085
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.924
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
51.721
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks from the Unsafe Browser with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.900
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
When
I successfully start the Unsafe Browser
26.992
And
I open the Tails homepage in the Unsafe Browser
11.759
And
the Tails homepage loads in the Unsafe Browser
0.638
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.424
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.906
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.036
Tags:
@product
13.618
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.426
And
I capture all network traffic
0.008
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.263
When
I do a TCP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.819
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.100
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.726
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.039
Tags:
@product
13.095
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting UDP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.308
And
I capture all network traffic
0.007
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.240
When
I do a UDP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.456
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.082
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.611
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.048
Tags:
@product
16.205
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting ICMP leaks of ping with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.647
And
I capture all network traffic
0.008
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.238
When
I send some ICMP pings
4.178
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.133
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.699
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.064
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
13.928
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified TCP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.008
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.008
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.551
When
I open an untorified TCP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.293
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.083
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.286
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.877
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
12.424
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified UDP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.044
When
I open an untorified UDP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
0.279
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.100
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.297
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.721
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
17.313
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified ICMP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.008
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.008
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.872
When
I open an untorified ICMP connection to 1.2.3.4
5.373
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.067
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.298
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.624
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
22.822
Scenario
The system DNS is always set up to use Tor's DNSPort
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.004
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD without network and logged in
8.889
And
the system DNS is using the local DNS resolver
0.012
And
the network is plugged
0.048
And
I successfully configure Tor
13.857
Then
the system DNS is still using the local DNS resolver
0.014
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.848
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
generate Cucumber HTML reports via:
Jenkins Plugin
|
Standalone
|
Sandwich
|
Maven