Cucumber Report
Jenkins
Previous results
Latest results
Features
Tags
Steps
Trends
Failures
Project
Number
Date
test_Tails_ISO_stable
4605
08 Jan 2024, 16:15
Feature Report
Steps
Scenarios
Features
Feature
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Pending
Undefined
Total
Passed
Failed
Total
Duration
Status
The Tor enforcement is effective
42
0
0
0
0
42
9
0
9
2:56.098
Passed
Tags:
@product
Feature
The Tor enforcement is effective
As a Tails user I want all direct Internet connections I do by mistake or applications do by misconfiguration or buggy leaks to be blocked And as a Tails developer I want to ensure that the automated test suite detects firewall leaks reliably
Tags:
@product
12.559
Scenario
The firewall configuration is very restrictive
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.936
Then
the firewall's policy is to drop all IPv4 traffic
0.122
And
the firewall is configured to only allow the clearnet and debian-tor users to connect directly to the Internet over IPv4
0.299
And
the firewall's NAT rules only redirect traffic for the Unsafe Browser, Tor's TransPort, and DNSPort
0.121
And
the firewall is configured to block all external IPv6 traffic
0.079
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.876
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
53.300
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks from the Unsafe Browser with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.926
And
I capture all network traffic
0.007
When
I successfully start the Unsafe Browser
30.218
And
I open the Tails homepage in the Unsafe Browser
9.747
And
the Tails homepage loads in the Unsafe Browser
0.935
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.464
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
1.229
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.049
Tags:
@product
13.419
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.008
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.312
And
I capture all network traffic
0.009
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.260
When
I do a TCP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.705
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.131
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.672
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.040
Tags:
@product
13.592
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting UDP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.620
And
I capture all network traffic
0.007
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.232
When
I do a UDP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.654
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.078
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.833
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.066
Tags:
@product
16.454
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting ICMP leaks of ping with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.875
And
I capture all network traffic
0.005
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.248
When
I send some ICMP pings
4.199
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.125
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.751
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.041
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
13.183
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified TCP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.888
When
I open an untorified TCP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.217
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.077
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.332
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.679
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
12.615
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified UDP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.231
When
I open an untorified UDP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
0.264
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.119
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.301
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.740
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
17.999
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified ICMP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.011
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
12.508
When
I open an untorified ICMP connection to 1.2.3.4
5.396
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.093
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.505
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.786
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
22.974
Scenario
The system DNS is always set up to use Tor's DNSPort
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD without network and logged in
8.916
And
the system DNS is using the local DNS resolver
0.028
And
the network is plugged
0.048
And
I successfully configure Tor
13.967
Then
the system DNS is still using the local DNS resolver
0.014
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.703
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
generate Cucumber HTML reports via:
Jenkins Plugin
|
Standalone
|
Sandwich
|
Maven