Cucumber Report
Jenkins
Previous results
Latest results
Features
Tags
Steps
Trends
Failures
Project
Number
Date
test_Tails_ISO_stable
4655
07 Feb 2024, 22:01
Feature Report
Steps
Scenarios
Features
Feature
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Pending
Undefined
Total
Passed
Failed
Total
Duration
Status
The Tor enforcement is effective
42
0
0
0
0
42
9
0
9
2:44.891
Passed
Tags:
@product
Feature
The Tor enforcement is effective
As a Tails user I want all direct Internet connections I do by mistake or applications do by misconfiguration or buggy leaks to be blocked And as a Tails developer I want to ensure that the automated test suite detects firewall leaks reliably
Tags:
@product
12.018
Scenario
The firewall configuration is very restrictive
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.427
Then
the firewall's policy is to drop all IPv4 traffic
0.135
And
the firewall is configured to only allow the clearnet and debian-tor users to connect directly to the Internet over IPv4
0.268
And
the firewall's NAT rules only redirect traffic for the Unsafe Browser, Tor's TransPort, and DNSPort
0.113
And
the firewall is configured to block all external IPv6 traffic
0.073
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.629
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
51.381
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks from the Unsafe Browser with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.094
And
I capture all network traffic
0.005
When
I successfully start the Unsafe Browser
28.444
And
I open the Tails homepage in the Unsafe Browser
10.816
And
the Tails homepage loads in the Unsafe Browser
0.602
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.417
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.930
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.084
Tags:
@product
12.248
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.007
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.510
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.221
When
I do a TCP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.424
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.084
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.596
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.046
Tags:
@product
12.461
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting UDP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.723
And
I capture all network traffic
0.005
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.217
When
I do a UDP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.439
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.074
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.701
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.062
Tags:
@product
15.793
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting ICMP leaks of ping with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.234
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.214
When
I send some ICMP pings
4.237
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.100
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.650
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.055
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
12.884
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified TCP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.004
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.622
When
I open an untorified TCP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.201
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.060
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.300
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.649
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
11.822
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified UDP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.004
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.422
When
I open an untorified UDP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
0.307
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.092
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.390
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.613
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
17.027
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified ICMP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.005
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.574
When
I open an untorified ICMP connection to 1.2.3.4
5.370
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.082
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.338
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.616
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
19.253
Scenario
The system DNS is always set up to use Tor's DNSPort
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.004
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD without network and logged in
7.832
And
the system DNS is using the local DNS resolver
0.034
And
the network is plugged
0.038
And
I successfully configure Tor
11.337
Then
the system DNS is still using the local DNS resolver
0.010
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.649
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
generate Cucumber HTML reports via:
Jenkins Plugin
|
Standalone
|
Sandwich
|
Maven