Cucumber Report
Jenkins
Previous results
Latest results
Features
Tags
Steps
Trends
Failures
Project
Number
Date
test_Tails_ISO_stable
4681
25 Feb 2024, 12:17
Feature Report
Steps
Scenarios
Features
Feature
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Pending
Undefined
Total
Passed
Failed
Total
Duration
Status
The Tor enforcement is effective
42
0
0
0
0
42
9
0
9
3:14.673
Passed
Tags:
@product
Feature
The Tor enforcement is effective
As a Tails user I want all direct Internet connections I do by mistake or applications do by misconfiguration or buggy leaks to be blocked And as a Tails developer I want to ensure that the automated test suite detects firewall leaks reliably
Tags:
@product
12.441
Scenario
The firewall configuration is very restrictive
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.840
Then
the firewall's policy is to drop all IPv4 traffic
0.144
And
the firewall is configured to only allow the clearnet and debian-tor users to connect directly to the Internet over IPv4
0.288
And
the firewall's NAT rules only redirect traffic for the Unsafe Browser, Tor's TransPort, and DNSPort
0.074
And
the firewall is configured to block all external IPv6 traffic
0.093
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.808
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
51.258
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks from the Unsafe Browser with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.856
And
I capture all network traffic
0.007
When
I successfully start the Unsafe Browser
29.095
And
I open the Tails homepage in the Unsafe Browser
9.225
And
the Tails homepage loads in the Unsafe Browser
0.628
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.445
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.772
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.053
Tags:
@product
12.030
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting TCP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.278
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.222
When
I do a TCP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.446
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.076
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.597
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.065
Tags:
@product
12.645
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting UDP leaks of DNS lookups with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.907
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.227
When
I do a UDP DNS lookup of "torproject.org"
0.425
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.078
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.632
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.048
Tags:
@product
16.505
Scenario
Anti test: Detecting ICMP leaks of ping with the firewall leak detector
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.004
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.924
And
I capture all network traffic
0.006
And
I disable Tails' firewall
0.285
When
I send some ICMP pings
4.176
Then
the firewall leak detector has detected leaks
0.112
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.661
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.036
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
12.851
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified TCP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.558
When
I open an untorified TCP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
1.219
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.073
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.228
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.613
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
12.127
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified UDP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.774
When
I open an untorified UDP connection to 1.2.3.4 on port 42
0.270
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.082
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.262
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.657
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
@check_tor_leaks
16.927
Scenario
The Tor enforcement is effective at blocking untorified ICMP connection attempts
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:442
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD and logged in and the network is connected
11.535
When
I open an untorified ICMP connection to 1.2.3.4
5.331
Then
the untorified connection fails
0.000
And
the untorified connection is logged as dropped by the firewall
0.060
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:450
0.311
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.602
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
Tags:
@product
47.886
Scenario
The system DNS is always set up to use Tor's DNSPort
Hooks
Before
features/support/hooks.rb:245
0.006
Steps
Given
I have started Tails from DVD without network and logged in
7.724
And
the system DNS is using the local DNS resolver
0.027
And
the network is plugged
0.048
And
I successfully configure Tor
40.075
Then
the system DNS is still using the local DNS resolver
0.010
Hooks
After
features/support/hooks.rb:291
0.692
After
features/support/hooks.rb:75
0.000
generate Cucumber HTML reports via:
Jenkins Plugin
|
Standalone
|
Sandwich
|
Maven